Stop Kicking the Tech Debt Can Down the Road

Do not index

Tackling technical debt is part art, part science. It demands a cultural shift just as much as a tactical one. The big idea is to stop digging the hole deeper while you systematically fill it in. This isn't about some mythical "refactoring sprint" that never arrives; it's about weaving debt repayment into the fabric of every single sprint.

Let's get this sorted, for good.

Your 'Move Fast' Culture Is a Debt-Fueled Illusion

It always starts with the best of intentions, doesn't it? You’re racing a deadline. You're trying to beat a competitor to market. "We'll circle back and fix it later," becomes the team's unofficial motto.

But here’s the thing about "later"—it’s a mythical land that never shows up on any product roadmap. Before you know it, you're drowning. This isn't just about messy code; it's about the compounding interest you pay in lost velocity, frustrated engineers, and blown opportunities. I saw this firsthand at a startup where a "temporary" payments integration, hacked together for a big launch, became an untouchable, terrifying monolith that blocked every subsequent feature in that part of the app for two years. The very culture that worshipped speed was throttling itself.

The True Cost of 'Later'

That "quick fix" or skipped unit test might save you a day this week, but it’s going to cost you weeks next quarter. The problem snowballs. Suddenly, adding a simple feature requires a heroic effort as developers navigate a minefield of fragile dependencies and undocumented hacks.

This drag on development isn't a minor annoyance. Developers spend a staggering 25% to 50% of their time wrestling with technical debt, which can torpedo development velocity by up to 40%. All that time is eaten up by debugging and untangling inherited complexity—a direct result of past shortcuts.

Forget the blame game. This is your wake-up call—the moment you realize the ship is taking on water and you're the one holding the bucket.

Moving Fast vs. Just Rushing

There’s a world of difference between being agile and just being reckless. Moving fast should mean shipping value incrementally and learning as you go. Rushing means cutting corners that cripple your ability to do exactly that.

When the pressure is on, teams make short-term trade-offs without grappling with the long-term fallout. This isn't an engineering failure; it's a failure of process and leadership. It sends a clear signal that speed is valued more than stability, a mindset that always leads to a brittle, expensive-to-maintain product.

This vicious cycle grinds progress to a halt and suffocates your team's ability to innovate. If you want to boost your team's output, it’s not about working harder—it’s about working smarter by fixing these foundational problems. For more on this, check out our guide on how to improve team productivity.

The first step to getting out of this mess is admitting you’re in it. Your "move fast" culture isn't so fast after all.

You Can’t Fix What You Can’t See

If technical debt were a monster, it’d be the invisible kind that trips you up in the dark. You can't fight it until you turn on the lights.

This means moving beyond vague complaints like a "messy codebase" and getting specific. You can't just feel that things are slow; you need cold, hard proof. This isn't about running an audit for the sake of it—it's about creating an honest, shared map of the battlefield. We have to make the intangible tangible.

This infographic gives a good overview of how tooling can help reveal the gremlins hiding in your code.

When you make these issues visible, the team can finally stop talking in circles and start working from a concrete list of problems to be solved.

Shedding Light on the Shadows

Making debt visible isn’t a one-shot deal. You can't rely on a single source of truth because debt hides everywhere—from the code itself to the very architecture holding it all together.

Here are a few ways I’ve seen teams start to illuminate the problem:

Static Code Analysis Tools: Think of these as an X-ray for your app. Tools like SonarQube automatically scan your codebase and flag "code smells," vulnerabilities, and overly complex methods. The beauty here is that they provide objective data that cuts through subjective opinions.

Architectural Reviews: Your codebase might look clean line by line but be a complete train wreck at the macro level. Regular architectural reviews help you spot the structural cracks—like tightly coupled services that should be independent or an outdated framework that’s a ticking time bomb.

Engineer Interviews: Your engineers are on the front lines. They live with the consequences of tech debt every single day. Just ask them: "What's the one part of the codebase you're afraid to touch?" Their answers are pure gold and will point you directly to the most painful, high-interest debt.

This isn’t about pointing fingers. It's about building a shared understanding of the problem. When everyone can see the same map, it’s a heck of a lot easier to agree on the destination.

Categorize to Conquer

Once you start finding things, you need to get organized. A giant, unsorted list of issues is just overwhelming. It paralyzes everyone into inaction. You have to group what you find into categories that make sense for your team.

For instance, start with a simple framework:

Code Debt: Issues confined to implementation details, like sloppy naming conventions, magic numbers, or a glaring lack of unit tests.

Design & Architectural Debt: The deeper, systemic problems. Think poor data modeling or a massive monolithic service that’s begging to be broken up.

Test & Documentation Debt: Gaps in your test coverage or, my personal favorite, outdated wikis that make onboarding new hires an absolute nightmare.

Categorizing helps you see patterns and, more importantly, begin to prioritize. You can track all these outstanding items to ensure that once they're identified, they don't get lost in the shuffle again.

After you know the scope and nature of your debt, you can finally start framing it as the business problem it truly is.

Frame It as a Business Problem, Not an Engineering One

Here’s where so many product and engineering leaders go wrong. They hear "technical debt," and their brain immediately files it under "engineering problem." You know, the geeky stuff someone else can deal with.

That’s a massive mistake.

Technical debt is a business problem, plain and simple. Every delayed feature, every security vulnerability, every minute of downtime—that’s the interest payment on your debt. And it’s coming directly out of your bottom line.

Translate Geek-Speak into Dollars and Cents

If you want the resources to fix this, you need to speak the language of the people holding the purse strings. That language is not "refactoring the authentication service." It's "reducing customer churn" and "increasing market share."

You have to connect the dots for them. This isn't about placing blame; it's about making the consequences painfully real.

Instead of: "Our CI/CD pipeline is slow and outdated."

Try: "Our slow pipeline means we only release once every two weeks, while our main competitor ships new features twice a week. We’re losing the innovation race, and it’s costing us market share."

This strategic reframing is everything. Industry leaders are now pushing CIOs to make technical debt a board-level conversation. When management truly understands the risks to business agility, fixing it becomes an imperative, not an option. You can see why this is so critical over at vfunction.com.

When you frame repayment as an investment in future velocity, you shift the entire conversation. It’s no longer a cost center; it’s a competitive advantage.

Create a Compelling Business Case

To get real buy-in, you can't just wave your hands about a "messy codebase." You need data. You have to tie specific debt items to tangible business outcomes.

It’s about translating technical issues into the kind of business impact that gets your CFO to sit up and pay attention.

Framing Technical Debt for Stakeholders

Technical Issue	Business Impact	How to Frame It
Outdated Framework	Security vulnerabilities, high maintenance costs, difficulty hiring engineers.	"We're running on a framework that's no longer supported, exposing us to significant security risks. It's also costing us an extra $80,000 a year in specialized developer time."
Monolithic Architecture	Slow feature development, high risk of system-wide outages.	"A single bug in one part of our app can bring the whole system down. This caused 2 hours of downtime last quarter, directly impacting revenue and customer trust."
Lack of Test Coverage	Frequent bugs in production, decreased customer satisfaction (CSAT).	"Our support team spends 30% of their time dealing with recurring bugs that proper test coverage would have caught. This is directly dragging down our CSAT scores."

When you present the problem this way, you’re no longer asking for a favor for the engineering team. You’re presenting a strategic plan to de-risk the business and accelerate growth. This is one of the core principles of leading effectively, and you can learn more by checking out these product management best practices.

Weave Debt Repayment Into Your Daily Workflow

Alright, you’ve convinced leadership that the sky is, in fact, falling. You’ve got buy-in. Now what?

The first instinct is to schedule a big, heroic "refactoring sprint." Don't. That’s the software equivalent of a crash diet—the weight just comes back, and it usually brings friends. It’s a temporary fix that treats the symptom, not the disease.

Worse, it teaches the organization that paying down debt is some extraordinary event, not a routine chore like taking out the trash. The only way this works long-term is to bake debt repayment into the very fabric of your process. It has to become as normal as writing new code.

Make It a Non-Negotiable Part of Every Single Sprint

The simplest way to start is to allocate a fixed percentage of every sprint to debt reduction. I’ve seen teams succeed with anywhere from 10% to 25%, but the number itself isn’t magic. Consistency is.

This can't be "extra" time or "if we get to it" time. It has to be a protected, non-negotiable budget. When you treat it like a feature with its own dedicated capacity, it stops being the first thing on the chopping block when a deadline gets tight.

Think about it like this: you wouldn't skip paying your rent just to buy a new couch. You budget for both because both are necessary. The same logic applies here.

The goal is to shift from reactive firefighting to proactive, continuous improvement. It’s about building a system where paying down debt is simply part of the job.

This approach means treating debt items like any other piece of work. They need to be ticketed, estimated, and prioritized just like user stories. When you run your regular refinement sessions, these tickets should be right there in the mix. If that process feels a bit rusty, we have a helpful guide on the backlog grooming activity that can sharpen things up.

Embrace the Boy Scout Rule

A powerful, low-overhead strategy is to adopt the "Boy Scout Rule"—always leave the code cleaner than you found it.

This doesn't mean every developer has to refactor an entire module every time they touch a file. It’s about small, incremental improvements.

Did you stumble on a horribly named variable? Rename it.

Is a function trying to do three different things? Break it up.

Is the code you’re modifying completely devoid of tests? Add one.

These tiny acts of hygiene compound over time, preventing small messes from becoming giant, untamable beasts. It also fosters a culture of collective ownership and, most importantly, stops the bleeding.

Automate Your Defenses

Finally, let your tools do some of the heavy lifting. Your CI/CD pipeline is your first line of defense against new debt. By embedding automated quality gates, you can catch suboptimal code before it ever gets merged into your main branch.

This isn't some far-off dream. Tools like SonarQube for static analysis and build servers like Jenkins can be wired directly into your workflow, creating a safety net that prevents poor-quality code from accumulating in the first place.

When you integrate these practices, debt repayment stops being a dreaded special project. It becomes a sustainable, value-adding part of your team's daily rhythm.

Adopt a Culture That Prevents Future Debt

Paying down existing debt is only half the battle. If you don't plug the leak, you'll just end up bailing water out of a sinking ship forever.

This isn’t about writing perfect code—that’s a fantasy. It's about making conscious, deliberate trade-offs and building a system that defaults to quality. This is about long-term health. Reducing technical debt isn't a project with a neat end date; it’s a fundamental change in how your team builds software.

It’s about finally breaking the vicious cycle of short-term gains leading to long-term pain.

Foster a Culture of Ownership

The biggest shift isn't a process change; it’s a psychological one.

Engineers have to feel empowered to push back on shortcuts. They are the guardians of the codebase, and they need the psychological safety to say, "No, that's a bad idea, and here’s why."

This only happens when leadership champions it. When a product manager is pushing to ship by Friday, an engineer needs to know they won't be penalized for pointing out the long-term cost. In fact, they should be rewarded for it.

Fostering this culture means celebrating the refactor that unblocked future work just as much as you celebrate the flashy new feature launch. It redefines "value delivery" to include stability and maintainability.

Make Trade-Offs Radically Transparent

Let's be real: not all debt is bad. Sometimes, taking on a calculated shortcut to hit a market window is the right strategic move. The key is to make this an explicit, documented decision, not a sloppy afterthought.

Create a formal process for accepting intentional debt:

Document the "Why": Why are we taking this shortcut? What specific business goal does it serve?

Estimate the Cost: What is the anticipated cost of repayment in terms of future engineering hours?

Schedule the Repayment: When will we pay this back? Create the ticket for the repayment work at the same time the debt is incurred.

Adopting a culture that actively prevents future technical debt involves implementing a range of mobile app development best practices that prioritize quality from the start.

By making these trade-offs transparent, you turn unintentional sloppiness into a strategic tool. You’re no longer just accumulating debt; you’re taking out a calculated loan with a clear repayment plan.

Got Questions About Tech Debt? Good.

We’ve peeled back a few layers of the technical debt onion, but let's be honest, it usually just leads to more questions. Here are a few of the big ones I see product and engineering folks wrestling with all the time.

Is All Tech Debt Bad?

Not a chance. Just like financial debt, there's a difference between a smart investment and a spending problem.

Good technical debt is a conscious, strategic choice. You take a shortcut to launch an MVP and validate an idea, fully aware you'll have to come back and clean it up. It's like taking out a calculated business loan to seize an opportunity. You've already got a ticket in the backlog for the "repayment."

Bad technical debt, on the other hand, is what happens when things go sideways. It’s the messy result of sloppy work, ignored warnings, or just plain neglect. It piles up silently, like credit card debt with a terrifying interest rate, until one day you realize it's completely crippled your ability to ship anything new. If you want to get into the nitty-gritty, you can delve deeper into the concept of technical debt.

How Do I Get Non-Technical Stakeholders to Care?

First, stop saying "refactoring." Stop talking about "code quality." These words mean nothing to them.

You have to speak their language: money, risk, and speed.

Frame the conversation in terms of business outcomes. Use an analogy they can immediately understand. I like comparing tech debt to a delivery truck that keeps breaking down. It’s slow, it’s unreliable, and it’s going to fail at the worst possible moment—probably on the way to a huge customer demo.

See the difference? One is a technical problem. The other is a business disaster.

Can't We Just Have a "Refactoring Sprint"?

Ah, the mythical refactoring sprint. It’s so tempting to think you can just pause the world for two weeks and magically fix everything.

But here’s the hard truth: it’s a band-aid, not a cure.

Big-bang refactoring efforts bring all feature development to a screeching halt, which is a great way to make your business partners lose their minds. More importantly, they do absolutely nothing to change the habits that got you into this mess in the first place.

A much, much better approach is to build debt repayment into your DNA. Carve out a fixed percentage of every single sprint—say, 20% of your team's capacity—and dedicate it to chipping away at debt. It becomes a sustainable, predictable habit of continuous improvement.

This isn't some radical idea; it’s just good practice. Weaving debt repayment into your daily work is one of the core continuous integration best practices that keeps your codebase healthy and prevents you from ending up in this situation again. You make it routine, and over time, the problem shrinks instead of grows.

Is your team drowning in a sea of spreadsheets, Slack messages, and siloed tools just to manage your sprints? Momentum unifies your entire Agile workflow—from standups and sprint planning to triage and backlog grooming—into one seamless platform. Ditch the tool-juggling and get back to shipping great software.

Get started with Momentum for free